Technology intelligence
Patent search is solved.
Patent insight is not.
Strata connects patents, scientific literature, companies, technologies and relationships into curated intelligence vaults.
Who leads neutral-atom quantum computing, and what is each of them betting on?
The field is splitting into three competing scaling philosophies: reconfigurable monolithic processors, stationary global-control architectures, and modular photonic interconnects.
Every statement traceable to the records beneath it
The problem
Information is available. Insight is still manually created.
What a database returns
Documents.
Ranked, exported, and handed over. The question you asked is not the thing it answered.
What you still work out by hand
- Who the competitors actually are
- What problems each of them is solving
- Which direction the technology is moving
- How the players and the research relate
- Where the whitespace is
- What science the filings rest on
Every one of those is assembled in a spreadsheet, by a person, and thrown away when the next question arrives.
The Strata difference
From documents to connected intelligence.
Retrieval hands you documents. A vault holds the relationships between them — which is where every question you actually care about gets answered.
Sources
- Patents
- Publications
- Companies
- People
Strata enrichment
Curated into a vault, then connected.
- Scoped to one technology
- Names resolved before anything is counted
- Claims, classifications and problems extracted
- Papers linked to the filings they sit behind
Intelligence
- Problems
- Technologies
- Relationships
- Trends
- Signals
Vaults
Scoped to one technology, on purpose.
Breadth is cheap and everyone has it. A vault is narrow — that is what makes the connections inside it worth trusting.
Live vault
Quantum
Patents and scientific publications across quantum computing, curated and connected — the vault behind our published analysis of the neutral-atom race.
Questions it takes
- Who leads this field, and what is each of them betting on?
- What science sits behind this patent?
- Where is the research moving faster than the patenting?
Intelligence it returns
- Players ranked by what they own, not what they claim
- The bottlenecks the field is spending its filings on
- Papers linked to the filings that track them
- Whitespace where science leads the claiming
- Every statement traceable to its records
Next
Further technology vaults are in build. Private vaults are scoped with the customer — your field, your competitor set, your portfolio.
Request a vault →What it is for
Six decisions, not a feature list.
Understand a technology
Get to the shape of a field — its bottlenecks, its lineages — without reading a thousand documents.
Analyse a competitor
What they file, what they publish, and where the two disagree.
Find emerging areas
Themes accelerating in the literature before they show up as claims.
Discover whitespace
Not where the patents are absent — where the science is present and the patents are not.
Track technical direction
Watch a field move, continuously, instead of re-running a search every quarter.
Build an IP landscape
A defensible map with every claim traceable to the records underneath it.
Research & insights
Judge it by what it produces.
We publish the analyses our vaults produce, in full — including the parts where the evidence runs thin.
All resources →Insight · Quantum
Neutral-Atom Quantum Computing
From movable atom arrays to erasure-aware fault tolerance and modular photonic interconnects
Read it →Why you can trust the output
Two records, one view
Patents and scientific publications correlated inside the vault — filings read against the science they rest on.
Names resolved before counting
Aliases, co-assignment and legacy corporate names are reconciled first. Otherwise every count built on top is wrong.
Method published with the work
Each analysis states how it was produced and what it cannot conclude. You can check it rather than trust it.
Bring us a technology worth understanding.
We are working with a small number of teams while we build. If a field matters to your decisions, we would like to hear which one.